<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flames of Freedom &#187; breadcrumbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/tag/breadcrumbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 02:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals on Crime?</title>
		<link>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/06/16/liberals-on-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/06/16/liberals-on-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breadcrumbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had this thought during a conversation with Elizabeth who was talking about the effect of gun free zones on crime.  It&#8217;s a cynical idea, but I wonder how much truth it may contain. More crime means you need more government to control crime. In particular, more police. When liberals are asked to cut budgets, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this thought during a conversation with Elizabeth who was talking about the effect of gun free zones on crime.  It&#8217;s a cynical idea, but I wonder how much truth it may contain.</p>
<blockquote><p>More crime means you need more government to control crime.  In particular, more police.  When liberals are asked to cut budgets, the first thing they cut are police.  But people hate that, and will often concede to tax increases instead.  Victory: liberalism.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/06/16/liberals-on-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to NRA</title>
		<link>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/02/27/note-to-nra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/02/27/note-to-nra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breadcrumbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see what you are doing.  Quit it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=12167">I see what you are doing</a>.  <a href="http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/02/27/dc-closer-to-congress/">Quit it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/02/27/note-to-nra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breadcrumbs</title>
		<link>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/01/23/breadcrumbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/01/23/breadcrumbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breadcrumbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two things struck me today as I performed my daily glean of headlines from aggregate news sites. One, an executive order from our newly inaugurated President, the other, a policy change from his newly appointed Secretary of State. The problem? I mean, aside from the fact that government has no business at all doing either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things struck me today as I performed my daily glean of headlines from aggregate news sites. One, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/23/obama.abortion/">an executive order from our newly inaugurated President</a>, the other, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jiyB3YWNQzERNDo_S57jjro74SRgD95T37708">a policy change from his newly appointed Secretary of State</a>. The problem? I mean, aside from the fact that government has no business at all doing <em>either</em> of these things.</p>
<p>Worked it out? It&#8217;s the recession. Presumably, President Obama <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jXUXTBgW1_48GquUHxSkdlrk6iqQ">knows about this particular situation</a> and is working to alleviate the strain. So.. why is it that he and his top cabinet official are actively working to increase spending given to <em>international</em> programs?</p>
<p>These policies come hot on the heels of <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Inauguration/Story?id=6665946&amp;page=3">the most expensive Presidential inauguration in US history</a>. It cost so much, in fact, that President Bush <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/13/AR2009011301583.html">declared a state of emergency in Washington, D.C.</a> to help cover the costs. A <em>state of emergency</em>. How is it that no one at the top is seeing that we just do not have the money for the things some of them are wanting to do?</p>
<p>This is not the first occurrence, nor will it be the last, in what I expect will become a long trail of breadcrumbs left by this administration. For all our sakes, I hope that I am wrong. In the meantime, stay vigilant and keep an eye out for the trail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flamesoffreedom.com/2009/01/23/breadcrumbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
