Over at Bench Memos, Matt Franck points out his response to an op-ed published by Joyce Appleby, apparently asking the question of whether Catholic justices should recuse themselves from cases reaching the Supreme Court on issues where the Catholic Church has taken a position. Matt Franck, ably demolishes her argument, but the whole exchange kind of planted a thought in my mind: I think the Chief Justice must have missed this one in Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.
I’m sure the depth of a judge’s religious convictions would have seemed an obvious 41st consideration in retrospect.
This entry was posted
on Saturday, June 13th, 2009 at 3:36 pm and is filed under Law.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a reply
Note: Flames of Freedom encourages free and open discussion, so comments may express views with which its authors disagree. Flames of Freedom and its authors do not implicitly endorse any comment simply by allowing it to remain visible and uncontested.
Note: By submitting a comment, you indicate your acceptance of our Comment Policy.